Part 10 (Season 14): Hermaphrodites in History

Below is the script for the first episode of Season 14 of my Philosophy Fluency podcast. 

You can listen to this episode here.

🎧 

Hello and welcome to the first episode of the brand new Season 14 of Philosophy Fluency. Last season was dedicated to Margaret Cavendish, and I analysed her philosophy of gender, especially within her play: The Convent of Pleasure. In the last couple of episodes, I put forward and described my intersex interpretation of the character of the Princess in this play, based on the historical figure of Queen Christina of Sweden. I also suggested that the character of the mediator was based on Queen Christina's mother who became hysterical after learning that the sex assigned to her baby son was considered a mistake. She couldn't adjust to her son being a daughter, unlike her husband, the father of the baby, Gustavus Adolphus, King of Sweden, who took it in his stride and brought her up more like a boy. 

Over mocha coffees today, I'll expand on my reading of Cavendish's philosophy of gender in her play The Convent of Pleasure. 

So, further to what I've just summarised about my interpretation, I think one strength of my intersex understanding of the Princess character in The Convent of Pleasure is that it answers the potential objection that the LGBT+ identity of the Princess isn't historically fitting because it may require modern day concepts and vocabulary about trans identities. 

This type of objection can range from people who merely value historical accuracy to others who simply hold anti-trans views whilst pretending it's somehow just a unquestionable fact that trans identities are somehow new and only part of a recent trend for so-called 'gender ideology' that didn't exist in past eras, in this case, back in the 17th century. 

Well, in my academic opinion: 

One, people's genuine experiences of their own gender expression and identity are timeless and occur in every century. Like other life experiences and sense of self, it doesn't rely on whether you can learn about it educationally first or what terminology is available to give it a name. 

Expanding our vocabulary about gender and personal experience is just there to assist the clarity and precision of our communication, not to create new concepts and identities that weren't there long before. Language is always lagging way behind people's life experiences, so its main purpose is to  describe what already exists as a non-verbal concept and identity. 

Two, there's both textual and historical evidence in support of my view that people encountered intersex people all the way down the ages, and society was well aware of them. Their clear existence in all historical ages doesn't rely on a sense of an individual's identity and there are biological, physical descriptions (including medical, religious, literary and biographical) which tell us what these intersex people were like and how they were treated in past societies.

The vocabulary around being physically intersex has changed, but the descriptions are still recognisable. It was Richard Goldschmidt, an endocrinologist, who renamed people of indeterminate biological sex as intersex in the 1910s, although this term didn't catch on until around the 1940s¹. Before then, intersex people were more commonly described, for instance: Born as a eunuch; and hermaphrodites. The latter term was used by Margaret Cavendish, for example, in her natural philosophy, but these days, it is now mostly reserved for historical references or only used if the intersex person so wishes. 

For instance, a birth certificate was reissued in 2012 in Ohio, America, for an intersex person, to correct their sex assigned to read that they are 'hermaphrodite', after showing medical proof that they were what's known as a 'true hermaphrodite' when they were born². Interestingly, this case was won in accordance with the binary gender ideology that TERFS and gender critics perpetuate, not despite it. Like good philosophy, it followed their so-called biological argument right through to its logical conclusion: if a ruling in America in 1987 claimed that birth certificates should be "an historical record of the facts as they existed at the time of birth" then if the baby is medically deemed a hermaphrodite at birth, then that should be recorded too.³

To record even a true hermaphrodite at birth as neatly fitting into male or female like other babies is, technically speaking, recording and trying to historically preserve a biologically inaccurate fact. 

A few years later at the end of 2016, Sara Kelly Keenan finally received her reissued birth certificate that changed her sex marker from female to intersex⁴. Like Queen Christina of Sweden, Keenan was considered to be a baby boy for the first few weeks, but this was suddenly reversed and he was given a birth certificate stating that he was a female⁵. Once an adult and given the choice, Keenan felt that their gender is non-binary, so they updated their ID to include this gender too⁶. In this way, in 2016, Keenan achieved both a legally recognised biological sex (ie intersex) and gender (ie non-binary)⁷. So all their official documentation could show that they are outside the gender binary, not just in terms of identity but in terms of biological reality too. 

So if TERFS and gender critics were genuinely interested in biological reality, they'd recognise the biological reality of, and true scientific facts about, intersex people, not shun them, eradicate them and rely on offensive tropes to label them abnormal so not worthy of consideration and rights. They remove them from the debate because they're inconvenient for their binary arguments and ideology. That's not only constructing gender binary arguments out of a strawman fallacy, it's also creating a false and dangerous ideology that has perhaps never been so virulent, and prevalent in the world in the past as it is today. 

There's an ever increasing extreme crackdown on any reference to, any acknowledgement, research, and access to knowledge about anything outside the gender binary, even when it's about the variety of intersex people that have been recorded and acknowledged, both in positive and discriminatory ways, all the way down the ages from:

1) Greek mythology, in which there's an intersex god called Hermaphroditus, who gave rise to the term hermaphrodite. Indeed, in The Convent of Pleasure,  the women worship pagan gods from the classical world. As I've discussed previously, in the Petticoat scene the Prince Princess is concerned she's not dressed correctly for worshipping Mars.

The worship of these gods in The Convent of Pleasure could be a nod from Cavendish to the famous Greek god Hermaphroditus. More on that in the following episode, next week. 

2) the skeptic philosopher Favorinus during Ancient Greek times, who was known to have intersex traits during his lifetime and was recorded as being an hermaphrodite in ancient books;

3) to both the Old Testament, the Tanakh in Judaism, such as Isaiah 56, most notably verses 4-7, and New Testaments, such as Matthew 19:12, which are both religiously positive about intersex people; 

4) to Sir, Lord Edward Coke, a 17th century judge who wrote a three volume treatise titled 'Institutes of the Lawes of England' published between 1628 and 1644, so Margaret Cavendish, born in 1623, would be aware of this during her lifetime. So the concept of being intersex was certainly available to Cavendish in her era so she may well have included this in her play, The Convent of Pleasure. 

As an additional point of interest: Sir Coke's legal treatise has underpinned American and English Common Law ever since. It is still cited in contemporary court cases, such as Roe v Wade. So I'm now wondering why this was not factored into this year's UK Supreme Court Ruling on biological sex.  It seems to me, that the ruling stating that there are only two biological sexes of male and female contradicts Sir Coke's legal treatise, and therefore also the legal concepts and definitions in English law, which acknowledge the existence of a non-binary sex, that of hermaphrodite and androgynous. For instance, he wrote that an hermaphrodite could inherit as either a male or female. 

and finally, 5) intersex people have been recognised through to the modern day Malta Declaration which lists the human rights of intersex individuals and was set out at the third International Intersex Forum in 2013. 

This is just the tip of the iceberg of my research over the past two weeks. There's plenty more to come.

So do join me next week as I continue my research journey. Until then have a good week and take care.

References: 

¹Genomics, Front Line, and Shannon Gunn. ‘Intersex: When Binary Notions Simply Don’t Fit’. Front Line Genomics, 18 November 2020. 

https://frontlinegenomics.com/intersex-when-binary-notions-simply-dont-fit/.

²NBC News. ‘Nation’s First Known Intersex Birth Certificate Issued in NYC’, 29 December 2016. https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/nation-s-first-known-intersex-birth-certificate-issued-nyc-n701186.

³Ibid

⁴Ibid

⁵Ibid

⁶Ibid

⁷Ibid

You can access Margaret Cavendish's play: The Convent of Pleasure that I discuss in my Philosophy Fluency episodes from the following online source:

Cavendish, Margaret (1668) ‘The Convent of Pleasure.’ Last accessed 12 September 2025. 

https://digital.library.upenn.edu/women/newcastle/convent/convent.html